Enfoques empregados nos países avançados para a análise da política de c&t

Renato Peixoto Dagnino

doi:10.48160/18517072re24.417

Autores/as

Renato Peixoto Dagnino Unicamp

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re24.417

Palabras clave:

Estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología, países avanzados, comunidad de investigación, política de ciencia y tecnología, análisis de datos

Resumen

En este trabajo se presenta un panorama de los enfoques empleados por los investigadores de los Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología de los países avanzados para el análisis de la Política de Ciencia y Tecnología (PCT). El texto toma como referencia las propias contribuciones y también las de aquellos investigadores que concibieron esos enfoques o que los aplicaron en el análisis de otras políticas. A continuación se formulan críticas a esas contribuciones que ponen en evidencia algunas de sus limitaciones para el examen del comportamiento de las comunidades de investigación en el proceso de elaboración de la PCT y que sugieren la pertinencia del enfoque utilizado por el autor para abordar la PCT latinoamericana.

Citas

Aguilar, L. (1996), El estudio de las políticas públicas, México, Miguel Ángel Porrúa.

Baumgartner, F. R. e B.D. Jones (1993), Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

Boudourides, M. (2003), “Governance in science & technology”, en Conference Responsibility Under Uncertainty, Reino Unido, University of York, del 31 de julio al 3 de agosto.

Boudourides, M. (2001), The politics of technological innovations: network approaches international Summer Academy on Technological Studies User Involvement in Technological Innovation, Austria, Deutschlandsberg, 8 al 14 de julio.

Callon, M. (1996), “The sociology of an Actor Network: the case of the electric vehicle”, en Callon, M. et al. (eds.), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, London, Macmillan.

Caswill, C. (2001), “Science Resource Decisions - Principals, Agents and Games - Thinking about science funding policies, decisions and processes”, en Siune, Science Policy – Setting the Agenda for Research, Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI, Dinamarca, The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy.

Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Coleman, J. et al. (1966), Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study, Nueva York, Bobbs Merrill.

Crowley, J. (2001), “Governmental cooperation strategies”, Report on Work Package 4 of an EU TSER Project (Institutional Innovation, Culture and Agency in the Framework of Competition and Innovation), París, Centre d'Etudes et de Recherches Internationales.

Dagnino, R. (2004), “A Relação Pesquisa–Produção: em busca de um enfoque alternativo”, en Santos, L. et al. Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade: o desafio da interação, Londrina, IAPAR, pp. 103-146.

Dagnino, R. (2003), “A Relação Universidade-Empresa no Brasil e o Argumento da Hélice Tripla”, Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 2, (1), pp. 267-308.

Dagnino, R. (2003b), “O processo decisório no complexo público de ensino superior e de pesquisa: uma visão de análise de política”, en Revista REDES, 20, (10), pp. 27-42.

Dagnino, R. et al. (2002), Gestão Estratégica da Inovação: metodologias para análise e implementação, Taubaté, Editora Cabral Universitária.

Dewey, J. (1927), The Public and Its Problems, New York, Swallow.

Elam, M. e M. Bertlsson (2002), “Consuming, engaging and confronting science: The emerging dimensions of scientific citizenship”, First Stage Report, disponible en: <http://www.spsg.org/scisoc/stage/StageDiscussPaper.pdf>.

Hackmann, H. (2001), “Governance theories and the practice of science policy making”, em Siune, K., Science Policy – Setting the Agenda for Research, Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI, Dinamarca, The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy.

Ham, C. e M. Hill (1993), The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, New York, Harvester Wheatshesf.

Hogwood, B. W. e L. A. Gunn (1984), Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Hoppe, R. (1999), “Policy analysis, science and politics: from 'speaking truth to power' to 'making sense together”, Science and Public Policy, 26, (3), pp. 201-203

John, P. (2000), “Policy networks”, en Nash, K. y A. Scot, Blackwell companion to Political Sociology, Blackwell.

John, P. (1999), Analysing Public Policy, Londres, Pinter.

Kenis, P. e V. Schneider (1991), “Policy Networks and Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a New Analytical Toolbox”, en Marin, B. y R. Mayntz (eds.), Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, Franckfurt, Campus Verlag, pp. 25-59.

Kersbergen, K. e F. Waarden (2001), “Shifts in Governance: Problems of Legitimacy and Accountability”, Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Paper as part of Strategic Plan 2002-2005.

Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Maasen, P. (1998), “Governmental steering and higher education”, en Rip, A. (ed.), Steering and effectiveness in a developing knowledge society, Utrecht, Lemma.

Marsh, D. y R. A. W. Rhodes (eds.) (1992), Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Mayntz, R. (1993), “Modernization and the logic of interorganizational networks”, en Child, J. et al., Societal Change between Market and Organization, Aldershot, Avebury, pp. 3-18.

Mouffe, C. (1999), Dimensions of Radical Democracy, London, Verso, “Democratic Citizenship and the political community”.

Nowotny, H. et al. (2001), Re-Thinking Science, Cambridge, Polity.

Peterson, J. e E. Bomberg, (1999), Decision-making in the EU, London, Macmillan Press.

Radaelli, C. M. (2002), “Democratising expertise?”, em Grote, J. R. e B. Gbikpi (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications. Disponible en: <http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/euro-studies/STAFF/Demexp.html>.

Rip, A. (1999), Contributions from social studies of science and constructive technology assessment, ESTO project on Technological Risk and the Management of Uncertainty, Twente, Centre for Science Studies of the University of Twente.

Rip, A. e B. J. R. Van der Meulen (1997), “The post-modern research system”, Science and Public Policy, 23, (6), pp. 343-352

Roth Deubel, A. (2002), Políticas públicas. Formulación, implementación y evaluación, Bogotá, Ediciones Aurora.

Sabatier, P. A. e J. Smith (eds.) (1998), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Framework, Boulder, Westview Press.

Scott, J. (2000), Social Network Analysis, London, Sage.

Siune, K. (coord.) (2001), Science Policy – Setting the Agenda for Research, Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI, Dinamarca, The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy.

Siune, K. y K. Aagaard (2001), Science Policy – Setting the Agenda for Research, Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI Workshop One. Report from Analyseinstitut for Forskning 2001/8.

Skoie, H. (2001), The Research Councils in the Nordic Countries – Developments and Some Challenges, Oslo, NIFU. Disponible en: <http://english.nifustep.no/layout/ set/print/norsk/publikasjoner/the_research_councils_in_the_nordic_countries_ developments_and_some_challenges>.

Tsipouri, J. (2001), “Perceived and actual roles of academics in science policy”, en Siune, K. y K. Aagaard, Science Policy – Setting the Agenda for Research, Proceedings from MUSCIPOLI, Workshop One, Report from Analyseinstitut for Forskning 2001/8.

Wildavsky, A. (1971), Speaking truth to power: the art and craft of policy analysis, Boston, Little Brown.