Publish and Punish. The Paper as a problem and the dynamics of scientific fields.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re12.707Keywords:
publish, paper, scientific fieldsAbstract
The present paper aims to show how the publication pressures have a crucial incidence on the structure of the scientific fields. This incidence operates not only as "target place" for the production of papers (and, in this sense, as the last step belonging the process of knowledge production) but it is also a crucial component of the production of knowledge itself. This occurs insofar the possibility of publishing, and even the existence of a Journal as a potentially recipient of the works, is present in the development of any research project, as it was shown by several empirical investigations in the sociology of science.
References
Bastide, Frangoise (1990), 'The ¡conography of scientific texts: principies of analysis", en Lynch, Michael, Woolgar, Steve (eds.), Representation in Scientific practice, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Bordieu, Pierre (1975), "Le champ scientifique", Actes de la Recherche en sciences sociales, No. 1-2.
Cueto, Marcos (1989), Excelencia científica en la periferia. Actividades científicas y actividad biomédica en el Perú, Lima, GRADE-CONCYTEC.
Dagnino, Renato, Thomas, Hernán y Davitt, Amílcar (1996), "El pensamiento en ciencia, tecnología y sociedad en América latina: una interpretación política de su trayectoria", en REDES. Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, vol. 3, No. 7, Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1982), "Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science", en Social Studies of Science, vol. 12.
Kreimer, Pablo (1992), "Un essai de fondation d'an champ de recherche: Le Programme STS-CNRS", París, CNAM-STS.
Kreimer, Pablo (1994), "Estudios sociales de la ciencia. Algunos aspectos de la constitución de un campo", en: REDES. Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, vol. 1, No. 2.
Kreimer, Pablo (1997 a), L 'universel et le contexte dans la recherche scientifique, París, CNAM-STS.
Kreimer, Pablo (1997 b), "¿Una modernidad periférica? La investigación científica entre lo universal y el contexto", ponencia presentada al /// Coloquio "Culturas científicas y saberes locales", Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Actas del Congreso, en prensa.
Latour, Bruno y Woolgar, Steve (1988), La vie de laboratoire. La production des faits scientifiques, París, La Découverte.
Latour, Bruno (1989), La science en action, París, La Découverte.
Law (1983), "Enrolement et contre-enrolement: Les luttes pour la publication d'un article scientifique", Information sur les sciences sociales, vol. 22, No. 12.
Lemaine, Gérard (1980), "Science normale et science hypernormale. Les stratégies de differenciation et les stratégies conservatrices dans la science", en Revue frangaise dee sociologie.
Medawar, Peter (1982), Consejos a un joven científico, Buenos Aires, FCE.
Matalon, Benjamín (1996), La construction de la science, París, Delachaux et Niestlé.
Pickering (1992), Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Stangers, Isabelle (1984), "Vieux problémes, idees neuves", Cahiers STS, No. 1, París, CNRS.
Vaccarezza, Leonardo (1997), "El movimiento CTS en América Latina", Buenos Aires, mimeo.
Vessuri, Hebe (comp.) (1983), La ciencia periférica, Caracas, Monte Ávila.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1998 Redes. Journal of Social Studies of Science and TechnologyThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
