Local Systems of Innovation. Development of firms’ innovation capacity: as evinced by the quasi-industrial district of Rafaela (Sta. Fe Province, Argentina)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re15.704Keywords:
innovation, industrial, regionalismAbstract
Globalization, open regionalism added to the emergence of new techno-organizational paradigms are redefining the environment for the development of economic agents’ competitive processes. Systematic competitive factors and
the non-price elements of competitiveness are gaining increasing importance. This is a consequence of factors such as: the rising level of “strategic uncertainty”, demand segmentation, market volatility, changes in the concept of efficiency and the possibility to combine bothmultiple supply) and scale economies. These phenomena have galvanized in the form of new state regulatory and deregulatory measures which have enabled and improved international exchange between businesses and productive sectors. In this new scenario agents responses which focus on product differentiation, incremental
improvements (in products processes and organization) new ways to reach markets and quality assurance are earning increasing recognition. That is to say in the search for differentiation, which is now assumed to be a part of the
competitive process, agents aimed at increasing what shall be referred to as capacity for innovation. In this given context the goal of our study is to introduce a proxy indicator for economic agents potential for learning, creating “competences“, transforming generic into specific knowledge and hence their potential for innovating. This indicator for agents’ innovative capacity has been applied to a panel of Argentine firms representative of the quasi-district of Rafaela, where the given conditions generate a combination of externalities very rarely found in other locations throughout the country. The proposed indicator has been defined in absolute terms so as to allow comparisons among different environments and isolation of differences among firms’ capacity for innovation which may be ascribed to microeconomic differences among their agents. These differences, in turn, stem from the fact that the agents belong in local systems with differing externalities.
References
Ascúa, R., Kantis, H. y Malet Quintar, N., (1999), El desarrollo de las tramas productivas en la ciudad de Rafaela, Instituto de Industria (UNGS), mimeo, Rafaela, Instituto de Economía, UTN.
Ascúa, R. y López, M., (1995), Señales de competitividad de la ciudad de Rafaela, Área Programación Económica, Municipalidad de Rafaela.
Bianchi, P. y Miller, L. (1994), Innovation, collective action and endogenous growth: an essay on institutions and structural change, Cuaderno 2, IDSE.
Boscherini, F., López, M. y Yoguel, G. (1998), Sistemas locales de innovación y el desarrollo de la capacidad innovativa de las firmas: un instrumento de captación aplicado al caso de Rafaela, Documento de Trabajo Nº 10, Instituto de Industria, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
Boscherini, F., Malet Quintar, N. y Yoguel, G. (1997), “Consideraciones acerca del ambiente y el desarrollo de las capacidades innovativas de las firmas”, en Segundas Jornadas Nacionales de la Red Pymes, La Plata, CEB.
Boscherini, F. y Yoguel, G. (1996), “Algunas consideraciones sobre la medición de los procesos innovativos: La relevancia de los rasgos informales e incrementales”, REDES, vol. 8, No. 3.
Camagni, R. (ed.) (1991), Innovation networks: spatial perspectives, Londres y Nueva York, Belhaven Press.
Casaburi, G. (1993), Dynamic Production System in Newly Liberalized Developing Countries: Agroindustrial Sectors in Argentina and Chile, Yale University, 1994.
Costamagna, P. y Boscherini, F. (1999), Sviluppo locale e ruolo delle istituzioni: alcune riflessioni sull’esperienza di Rafaela (Argentina), mimeo.
Gregersen, B., Johnson, B. (1996), “Learning economies, innovation systems and European Integration”, en Regional Studies, vol. 31.
Johannisson, B. (1994), “Designing supportive contexts for everging enterprises”.
Lassini (ed.) (1985), Competitivitá e cooperazione nel processo innovativo dell'impresa, Milán, Franco Angeli.
Lassini (1986), Opportunita' tecnologiche, piccola dimensione e strategie innovative, Bolonia, Il Mulino.
Lassini (1992), “Il ruolo dell'attivitá di R&S per lo sviluppo della competitivitá delle PMI”, en Onida, F., Viesti, G. y Falzoni, A. M. (eds.), I. Distretti Industriali: crisi o evoluzione, Egea.
Lundvall, B. A. (1992), “The learning economy: challenges to economic theory and policy”, Paper at the EAEPE Conference Copenhagen.
Lundvall, B. A. y Johnson, B. (1994), “Sistemas nacionales de innovación y aprendizaje institucional”, Comercio Exterior, No. 8.
Malerba, F. (1988), “La dinamica di lungo periodo della ricerca e sviluppo dell'industria italiana”, en Rivista di Política Económica, pp. 1-30.
Malerba, F. (1993), “National System of Innovation: The case of Italy”, en Nelson (ed.), National Innovation System, Oxford.
Malerba, F. y Orsenigo, L. (1993), “L'accumulazione delle capacitá tecnologiche nell'industria italiana (1969-1984)”, en Filippini (ed.), Innovazione tecnológica e servizi alle imprese, Franco Angeli.
Meyer-Krahmer, F. (1984), “Measuring innovations output”, Research Policy.
Moori-Koenig, V. y Yoguel, G. (1998), “El desarrollo de capacidades innovativas de las firmas en un medio de escaso desarrollo del sistema local de innovación”, Instituto de Industria UNGS, Documento de Trabajo No. 9.
Moori-Koenig, V. y Yoguel, G. (1999), Desarrollo metodológico para estudios de competitividad, el caso de firmas del Gran Buenos Aires, Instituto de Industria, UNGS, Documento de Trabajo No. 17.
Morgan, K. (1995), “The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal”, University of Wales Cardiff.
Putnam, R. (1993), “The prosperous community: social capital and public life”.
Quintar, A., Ascúa, R., Gatto, F., y Ferraro, C. (1993), “Rafaela, un cuasi-distrito italiano ‘a la argentina’”, Programa CFI-CEPAL, Documento de Trabajo Nº 35, Pridre.
Sepúlveda Ramírez, L. (1999), “Construyendo política industrial. Enfoque socioeconómico aplicado a un estudio regional”, Tesis de Maestría, Instituto de Industria, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
Yoguel, G. y Boscherini, F. (1996), “La capacidad innovativa y el fortalecimiento de la competitividad de las firmas: El caso de las Pymes exportadoras argentinas”, CEPAL, Documento de Trabajo No. 71.
Yoguel, G., (1999), “Grado de aislamiento de las firmas y rol del ambiente”, en Yoguel, Angelelli, Moori-Koenig, Gutman, Milesi y Rabetino, El entorno competitivo y las restricciones para el desarrollo de las Pymes: la visión de las firmas y de las instituciones, mimeo, Instituto de Industria, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Redes. Journal of Social Studies of Science and TechnologyThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/



