Comentarios a las reflexiones de Terry Shinn: La Triple Hélice y la Nueva Producción del Conocimiento enfocadas como campos socio-cognitivos

Judith Sutz

doi:10.48160/18517072re18.572

Autores/as

Judith Sutz Udelar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re18.572

Palabras clave:

producción de conocimiento, triple hélice

Resumen

Estas reflexiones de Terry Shinn son, además de interesantes –como siempre–, especialmente provocativas. Afirmaciones por demás netas, atribución de intenciones, hipótesis arriesgadas, comentarios mordaces: ¿cómo ubicarse frente a este texto? Poco más puede hacerse aquí que seleccionar unos pocos puntos y apuntar a un diálogo telegráfico. Inevitablemente, quedará sabor a poco.

Citas

Arocena, R. y Sutz, J. (2000), “Looking into National Systems of Innovation from the South”, Industry and Innovation 7, No 1, pp. 55-75.

Casas, R., Gortari, J. y Santos, M.J. (2000), “The building of knowledge spaces in Mexico: a regional approach to networking”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 225,242.

Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (1995), “The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development”, EASST Review 14, No 1, pp. 11,19.

Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (1997), “Introduction: Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy”, en Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (editores), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London.

Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (2000), “The dynamic of innovation: from National Systems of Innovation and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 109,124.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C y Terra, B. (2000) “The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution from ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 303,313.

Etzkowitz, H. (1990), “The second academic revolution: the role of research university in economic development”, en Cozzens, S., Healey, P., Rip, A. y Ziman, J., The Research System in Transition, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Etzkowitz, H. (1997), “The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism”, en Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (editores), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London.

Etzkowitz, H. (1998), “The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages”, Research Policy 27, pp. 823-833.

Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. y Trow, M. (1994), The new production of knowledge, Sage, Londres.

Giesecke, S. (2000), “The contrasting roles of government in the development of biotechnology industry in the USA and Germany”, Research Policy 29, N2, pp. 205,219.

Godin, B. y Gingras, Y. (2000), “The place of universities in the system of knoweldge production”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 273,278.

Kobayashi, S. (2000), “Applying audition systems from the performing arts to R&D funding mechanisms: quality control in collaboration among the academic, public and private sectors in Japan”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 181,192.

Langford, C.H. y Langford, M.W. (2000), “The evolution of the rules for access to megascience research environments viewed from Canadian experience”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 169,180.

Lundvall, B.-A. y Borrás, S. (1997), “The globalising learning economy: implication for innovation policies”, Targeted Socio-Economic Research, European Commission.

Morris, N. (2000), “Vial bodies: conflicting interests in the move to new institutional relationships in biological medicines research and regulations”, Research Policy 29,No 2, pp. 135,148.

Sábato, J. y Botana, N. (1975), La ciencia y la tecnología en el desarrollo de América Latina”, en Sábato J. (coord.). El pensamiento latinoamericano en la problemática ciencia-tecnología-desrrollo-dependencia, Paidós, Bs. As.

Shinn, T. (1997), “Crossing boundaries: The emergence of Research-Technology Communities”, en Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (editores), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London.

Sutz, J. (2000), “The university-industry-government relations in Latin America”, Research Policy 29, No 2, pp. 279, 290.

Van den Besselaar, P. (1998), “Is S&T policy research transdisciplinary?”, ponencia presentada a la Conferencia Triple Hélice, Nueva York, enero.

Ziman, J. (2000), Real Science. What it is, and what it means, Cambridge University Press, UK.