Biopolitics of a Hereditary "Syphilis" in the Northeastern Sertão: Resistances to Modernity?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re42.597Keywords:
rare genetic disease, biopolitics, biomedicalization, necropoliticsAbstract
This article analyzes the social construction of a genetic disease in Brazil's northeastern sertão from the theoretical perspective of Science and Technology Studies, focusing on processes of biomedicalization, biopolitics, and necropolitics. A disease traditionally known as syphilis was rediagnosed as Spoan Syndrome 200 by a group of researchers who played a crucial role in introducing scientific knowledge to this community. However, resistance emerged from both patients and their families, as well as from the local public authorities, for different reasons.
To understand these resistances, the methodology involved a literature review on transformations in the health field; a laboratory ethnography conducted at the Human Genome Study Center (CEGH-USP) laboratories at the University of São Paulo; interviews with researchers; and the collection of secondary data on rare genetic diseases that occur with higher frequency. The research conclusions indicate that to understand a disease with two names, it's first necessary to grasp its cultural context, the applied biopolitics, and the sociability relationships created by the disease. Secondly, it suggests that replacing traditional narratives with scientific discourse in a place that resists science itself might be a warning that we are imposing a worldview that may not be beneficial for Serrinha dos Pintos.
References
Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Mineápolis, University of Minneapolis Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2007), A distinção. Crítica social do julgamento, San Pablo/Porto Alegre, edusp/Zouk.
Callon, M. y V. Rabeharisoa (2003), “Research ‘in the wild’ and the shaping of new social identities”, Technology in Society, vol. 25, Nº 2, pp. 193-204.
Clarke, A. et al. (2003), “Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and us Biomedicine”, American Sociological Review, vol. 68, Nº 2, pp. 161-194.
Clarke, A. et al. (eds.) (2010), Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the us, Durham/Londres, Duke University Press.
Cooper, M. (2008), Life As Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era, Seattle, University of Washington Press.
Foucault, M. (1999), História da Sexualidade. Volume 1, Río de Janeiro, Graal.
Geertz, C. (2008), A Interpretação das Culturas, 13ª reimpr., Río de Janeiro, ltc.
Jasanoff, S. (2004), “The idiom of co-production”, en Jasanoff, S. (ed.), States of Knowledge: the Co-production of Science and Social Order, Londres/Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 1-12.
Jasanoff, S. y S-H. Kim (eds.) (2015), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (2004), Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Londres, Harvard University Press.
Martin, E. (1994), Flexible Bodies: Tracking Immunity in American Culture: From Days of Polio to the Age of aids, Boston, Beacon Press.
Mbembe, A. (2003), “Necropolitics”, Public Culture, vol. 15, Nº 1, pp. 11-40.
Nydal, R., S. Efstathiou y A. Laegreid (2011), Crossover Research: exploring the third mode of integration, Trondheim, NTNU.
Osada, N. (2006), “Fazendo gênero nas Ciências: uma análise das relações de gênero na produção do conhecimento do Projeto Genoma da Fapesp”, tesis de maestría, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Política Científica e Tecnológica, Instituto de Geociéncias, Campinas, Unicamp.
Osada, N. (2012), “O processo de biomedicalização no Brasil: Estudo da prática científica em pesquisas sobre doenças genéticas”, tesis de doctorado en Política Científica e Tecnológica, Instituto de Geociéncias, Campinas, Unicamp.
Osada, N. y M. Costa (2006), “Construção social de gênero na Biologia: preconceitos e obstáculos na biologia molecular”, Cadernos Pagu, vol. 27, pp. 279-299.
Pickering, A. (1995), The Mangle of Practice, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Rabinow, P. (1996), Essays on the Anthropology of Reason, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Rabinow, P. y N. Rose (2006), “O conceito de biopoder hoje. Política e Trabalho”, Revista de Ciências Sociais, Nº 24, pp. 27-57.
Rose, N. (2007a), “Genomic suscetibility as an emergency form of life”, en Burri, R. y J. Dumit, Biomedicine as Culture, Nueva York, Routledge, pp. 141-150.
Rose, N. (2007b), The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjetivity in the Twenty-First Century, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Santos, S. y N. Bizzo (2005), “From ‘New Genetics’ to Everyday Knowledge: Ideas About How Genetic Diseases Are Transmitted in Two Large Brazilian Families”, Science Education, vol. 84, Nº 4, pp. 564-576.
Thompson, C. (2005), Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies, Cambridge/Londres, The MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Redes. Journal of Social Studies of Science and TechnologyThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/



