Beyond role expectations: 'Becoming' in interdisciplinary research on global change, climate and the environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re54.149Keywords:
Interdisciplinary, Professional roles , EtnographyAbstract
This article seeks to contribute to growing discussions, in this journal and elsewhere, on the intellectual, personal and emotional transformations that Science and Technology Studies (STS) scholars doing ethnographic fieldwork undergo with each new research project and collaboration. Drawing from our experience of being ‘embedded’ within large collaborations in climate change science and environmental science, we propose the notion of ‘becoming’ to capture the overall positive transformations ethnographers experience, which go beyond the more static and one-dimensional understanding of ‘roles’ often found in the literature. We conclude with some remarks on the transformations or ‘becomings’ that our collaborators also experience.
References
Balmer, A. S., et alli. (2015), Taking roles in interdisciplinary collaborations: Reflections on working in post-ELSI spaces in the UK synthetic biology community. Science and Technology Studies, 28, (3), pp. 3–25.
Balmer, A. S., et alli. (2016), Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3(1), pp. 73–80.
Barry, A., y Born, G. (2013), Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, N.Y: Routledge.
Bondi, L. (2005), "Making connections and thinking through emotions: between geography and psychotherapy", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30, (4), pp. 433–448.
Bowman, D. (2009), "Studying up, down, sideways and through: Situated research and policy networks", The Future Of Sociology: Proceedings of The Annual Conference of the Australian Sociological Association, pp. 1–11.
Braidotti, R. (1994), Nomadic Subjects (Gender and), Nueva York, Columbia University Press.
Callard, F., y Fitzgerald, D. (2015), Rethinking interdisciplinarity across the social sciences and neurosciences, Palgrave MacMillan.
Calvert, J., y Schyfter, P. (2017), "What can science and technology studies learn from art and design? Reflections on ‘Synthetic Aesthetics", Social Studies of Science, 47, (2), pp. 195–215.
Crang, M. (2002), "Qualitative methods: the new orthodoxy ?", Progess in Human Geography, 26, (5), pp. 647–655.
Crang, M. (2003), "Qualitative methods : touchy , feely , look-see ?", Progress in human geography, 27, (4). pp. 494-504.
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., y Massumi, B. (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.
Faubion, J. y Marcus, G. (eds) (2009), Fieldwork Is Not What It UsedTo Be: Transition in Anthropology‘s Culture of Method, Ithaca, CornellUniversityPress.
Fairley, P. (2017), "Policy: Getting political", Nature, 550, (7675), S59–S61.
Fitzgerald, D., y Callard, F. (2014), "Social Science and Neuroscience beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements", Theory, Culture & Society, 0263276414537319.
Forsythe, D. E. (1999), "Ethics and Politics of Studying Up in Technoscience", Anthropology of Work Review, 20, (1), pp. 6–11.
Funtowicz, S. y Hidalgo, C. (2008), "Ciencia y política con la gente en tiempos de incertidumbre, conflicto de intereses e indeterminación", en Apropiación social de la ciencia, López Cerezo, J. A., y F.J. Gómez González (eds), Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva.
Gerson, E. M. (2015), "The Interaction of Research Systems in the Evo-devo Juncture", en Love A. C. (Ed.), Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development, Berlin, Springer, pp.441-457.
Goffman, E. (1961), Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction, Conneticut, Martino Fine Books.
Grosz, E. (1994), Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism (Theories o), Indiana, Indiana University Press.
Grundmann, R. (2016), "Climate change as a wicked social problem", Nature Geoscience, 9, (8), pp. 562–563.
Guston, D. H. (2014), "Understanding “anticipatory governance”, Social Studies of Science, 44, pp. 218–242.
Hammersley, M. (2006), "Ethnography: problems and prospects", Ethnography and Education, 1, (1), pp. 3-14.
Hidalgo, C., Natenzon, C. E., y Podesta, G. (2011), "From enthusiasm to pragmatism: Shifting perspectives of success in interdisciplinary research", Interciencia, 36, (2), pp. 113–120.
Hidalgo, C. (2020), "Procesos colaborativos en acción: la provisión de servicios climáticos y la elaboración de pronósticos por impacto en el sur de Sudamérica, Medio ambiente y urbanización", Instituto Internacional de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo IIED-LA, 92-93, pp. 63-92.
Jasanoff, S. (2010), "A new climate for society", Theory, Culture and Society, 27, (2), pp. 233–253.
Klein, J. T. (2017), "A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity", en Thompson, K. y C. Mitcham (eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 15-30.
Krauß, W. (2015), "Linking sediment and sentiment : on observing a sci-art project", Journal of Science Communication, 14, (1), pp. 1–7.
Landström, C. (2017), Transdisciplinary Environmental Research: A Practical Approach, Palgrave Macmillan.
Lane, S. N., Odoni, N., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. J., Ward, N., y Bradley, S. (2011), "Doing flood risk science differently: An experiment in radical scientific method", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, (1), pp. 15–36.
Latour, B. (1998). To modernize and to ecologize? That is the question. In N. Castree y B. Willems-Baun (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the Milenium (pp. 221–242). Routledge.
Latour, B., y Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Lewis, S., y Russell, A. (2011), "Being embedded : a way forward for ethnographic research", Etnography, 12, (3), pp. 398-416.
Lynch, M. (1985), Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science, 15, (1), pp. 37–66.
Marcus, G. (2010), "Collaborative Options and Pedagogical Experiment in Anthropological Research on Experts and Policy Processes", Anthropologie de la globalisation: Tendances et tensions, Intervention 10 NovEHESS Paris, France.
Mazel-Cabasse, C. (2018), "What (Sociotechnical) Resilience is Made of: Personal trajectories and earthquake risk mitigation in the San Francisco Bay Area", en Amir, S. (Ed.), The Sociotechnical Constitution of Resilience: A New Perspective on Governing Risk and Disaster, Londres, Palgrave Macmillan.
Mills, C. W. (1959), The Sociological Imagination, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mol, A. (2003), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Duke University Press.
Nader, L. (1972), “Up the Anthropologist: Perspectives Gained from Studying up”, en Hymes, D. (ed.), Reinventing Anthropology, New York, Pantheon Book, pp. 284–311.
O’Connor, E. (2017), "Touching tacit knowledge: handwork as ethnographic method in a glassblowing studio", Qualitative Research, 17, (2), pp. 217–230.
Plesner, U. (2011), "Studying sideways: Displacing the problem of power in research interviews with sociologists and journalists", Qualitative Inquiry, 17, (6), pp. 471–482.
Pohl, C., et alli. (2010), "Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal", Science and Public Policy, 37, (4), pp. 267–281.
Polanyi, M. (2009), The Tacit Dimension, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Rabinow, P., y Bennett, G. (2012), Designing Human Practices. An Experiment with Synthetic Biology, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Ramírez-i-Ollé, M. (2017), "From 'climate sceptic' to “dendro-sociologist”: Considering the role of trust in the communication of science in action", en Ribeira , T. y L. Reyes-Galino (eds.), Intercultural Communication and Science and Technology Studies, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 105–122)
Ravetz, J. (2001), "Science advice in the knowledge economy", Science and Public Policy, 28, (5), pp. 389–393.
Rödder, S. (2017), "The Climate of Science-Art and the Art-Science of the Climate: Meeting Points, Boundary Objects and Boundary Work", Minerva, 55, (1), pp. 93–116.
Stengers, I. (2011), “Another science is possible! A plea for slow science", presentado en Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres (ULB), Inauguratial lecture Chair Willy Calewaert 2011-2012.
Stengers, I. (2018), Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, Nueva York, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Thompson, C. (2007), Making Parents The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Vienni Baptista, B., et alli. (2020), "Final Report of Literature Review on Understandings of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research", H2020 Project Shaping interdisciplinary practices in Europe.
Vienni-Baptista, B., et alli. (2022), "Situated expertise in integration and implementation processes in Latin America", Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 184.
Viseu, A. (2015a), "Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist", Social Studies of Science, 45, (5), pp. 642–664.
Viseu, A. (2015b), "Integration of social science into research is crucial", Nature, 525, 291.
Volvey, A. (2012), "How to Get in(to) Touch. Toward a Hapatic Regime of Knowledge in Geography", en Paterson, M. y M. Dodge (eds.), Touching Space, Placing Touch, Farnham, Ashgate Pub Co.
Wynne, B. (2010), "Strange Weather, Again", Theory, Culture & Society, 27, (2–3), pp. 289–305.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Redes. Journal of Social Studies of Science and TechnologyThe documents published here are governed by the licensing criteria
Creative Commons Argentina.Atribución - No Comercial - Sin Obra Derivada 2.5 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/