Technology diffusion.

Authors

  • OCDE OCDE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re8.825

Keywords:

diffusion, technology

Abstract

This chapter analyses the mechanisms of technology diffusion and discusses the need for making diffusion policy a major element of overall technology policy. The analysis is based on a distinction between disembodied technology diffusion and equipment-embodied technology diffusion. Disembodied technology diffusion is characterised by research spillovers and by the absorptive capacity of firms. The term "research spillover" refers to knowledge developed by one firm becoming potentially available to others. Absorptive capacity refers to the ability of firms to an intangible nature, R&D thus both develops new products and enhances the capacity of firms to learn to anticipate and follow future developments. Formal or informal networks of industries and firms, within which participants are at the same time suppliers and demanders and demanders of new technology, facilitate this process.

Equipment-embodied diffusion recalls the more traditional pattern, in which a few industries act as suppliers os new technology through their sales of technologically-intensive goods to downstream industires. Certain key technologies (mostly related to information technology - I T - ) play a central role. Interantional differences, market structure, the expectations of investors, characteristics of innovations in modern production systems, skills abailability and the organisation of firms all influence this process. Market structure in the supplying industries determines prices of technologically-intensive inputs and thus the degree to which benefits due to the original innovation are captured by the user industries or consumers. The real or perceived pressures of competition and the relative advantages of using competing technologies affect the pace of investment and adoption of new technologies.

The economic performance of the bulk of manufacturing and sevice industries that lie outside new technology sectors depends to a large extent on adopting ideas and products developed elsewhere. Since society benefits from the R&D efforts of firms, public policies should provide innovators with an environment which stimulates innovative activity while allowing maximun use of their products. A stable macro-economic environment that encourages investment in the creation and adoption of new technologies is an important prerequisite. More important, however, are micro-economic policies that incite firms to share information, develop absorptive capacity and increase rates of adoption of new techologies, either directly (through subsides, financial schemes, etc.) or indirectly (through alteration of the institutional and regulatory environment).

References

Abemathy, W. J. (1978), The Productivity Dilemma: Roadblock to Innovation in the Automobile Industry, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

Amable, B. y M. Mouhoud (1990), "Changement technique et compétitivité industrielle: une comparaison des six grands pays industriéis", IRES Working Paper, No. 90-01.

Antonelli, C. (1991b), The Economics of Information Networks, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

Arthur, B. (1988), "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and 'lock-in' by Small Historical Events", Economic Journal, marzo.

Atkinson, P. y J. Stiglitz (1969), "A New View of Technological Change", Economic Journal, septiembre.

Bemstein, J. (1989), "The Structure of Canadian Iterindustry R&D Spillovers, and the Rates of Return to R&D", Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 37, No. 3.

Bemstein, J. y M. I. Nadiri (1989), "Research and Development and Intra-industry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality", Review of Economic Studies, vol. 56, pp. 249-269.

Bresnahan, T. (1986), "Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance Mainframe Computers in Financial Services", American Economic review, vol. 76, No. 4.

Cohén, W. M. y D. A. Levinthal (1989), "Innovation and Leaming: The Two Faces of R&D", Economic Journal, septiembre.

Cowan, R. (1991), "Technological Variety and Competition: Issues of Difussion and Itervention", en OCDE (1991C).

David, P. (1987), "New Standards for the Economics of Standardizaron", en Dasguota and Stoneman.

Davies, S. (1979), The Diffusion of Process Innovations, Cambridge University Press.

Davis, L. (1988), "Technology Intensity of US, Canadian and Japanese Manufactures Output and Exports", US Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, junio.

Davis, P. (1986), "Understanding the Economics of QWERTY: The Necessity of History", en W. N. Parker (ed.) Economic History and the Modern Economist, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

Englander, S., R. Evenson y M. Hanazaki (1988), "R&D, Innovation, and the Total Factor Productivity Slowdown", OCDE Economic Studies, No. 11.

Ergas, H. (1987b), "Does Technology Policy Matter", en B. R. Guile y H. Brooks (eds.), Technology and Global Industry, Washington D.C., National Academy Press.

Foray, D. (1990a), "L'économie des rendements croissants et l'économie de la firme innovatrice", paper presented to the Paris TEP Technology and Competitiveness Conference, junio.

Foray, D. (1990b), "Explotations des externantes de réseau vs. Innovation de normalisation", Reveu d'Economie Industñelle, No. 51.

Gold, B. (1989), "Technological Diffusion in Industry: Research Needs and Shortcomings", Journal of Industrial Economics, marzo.

Goto, A. y K. Suzuki (1989), "R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries", The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 71, No. 4.

Griliches, Z. (1979), "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Developmentto Productivity growth", Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, No. 1.

Griliches, Z. y F. Lichtenberg (1984), "Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity growth: A Reexamination", The Review of economics and Statistics, vol. 65.

Hanel, R, J. F. Angers y M. Cloutier (1986), L'effet des dépenses en R-D surta croissance de la productivité, Québec, Ministére de I'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Science, Direction de la Maítrise du Développement Scientifique et Technologique.

Jacobs, D. (1990), "The Policy Relevance of Diffusion", report for Policy Studies on Technology and Economy, The Hague, Ministry of Economic Affairs of the Netherlands.

Jaffe, A. (1986), "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers in R&D. Evidence from Firms Patents, Profits and Market Valué", American Economic Review, vol. 76, No. 5.

Klein, B. H. (1979), "The Slowdown in Productivity Advances: A Dynamic Explanaron", en C. T Hill y J. M. Utterback (eds.), Technological Innovation for a Dynamic economy, Nueva York.

Kodama, F. (1990), "Can Changes in the Techno-economic Paradigm be Identified Through Empirical and Quantitative Study?", ST Review, No. 7, París, OCDE.

Levin, R. (1988), "Approphability, R&D Spending and Technological Performance", American Economic Review, Papers y Proceedings, mayo.

Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson y S. Winter (1987)," Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, No. 3.

Levin, R. y P. Reiss (1984), "Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure", en Z. Griliches, (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Levin, R. y P. Reiss (1989), "Cost-reducing and Demand-creating R&D with Spillovers", Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 19, No. 4.

Lundvall, B. A. (1991), "Innovation, the Organised Market and Productlvity Slowdown", en OCDE (1991C).

Mansfield, E. (1968), Industrial Research and technological Innovation, Nueva York, W. W. Norton.

Mansfield, E. (1985), "How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?", Journal of Industrial Economics, diciembre.

Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, A. Romeo, S. Wagner y G. Beardsley (1977), "Social and Prívate Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations", Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 77, No. 2.

Metcalfe, S. (1990), "On Diffusion Investment and the process of Technological Change", en Deiaco et al.

Mohnen, P. (1989),"New Technologies and Inter-lndustry Spillovers", STReview, No. 7, París, OCDE.

Nelson, R. (1980), "Balancing Market Failure and Government Inadequacy: The Case of Policy Towards Industrial R&D", Yale University Working Paper No. 840.

Nelson, R. y S. Winter (1977), "In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation", Research Policy, vol. 6, No. 1.

OCDE (1979a), Technology on Trial, París.

OCDE (1988a), Science and Technology Policy Outlook, París.

OCDE (1991b), Information Technology Standards: The Economic Dimensión, París.

Papaconstantinou, G. (1991), "Research Spillovers, International Competition and Economic Performance", PhD. dissertation, London School of Economics.

Ray, G. (1984), The Difussion of Mature Technologies, Cambridge University Press.

Ray, G. (1989), "Full Circle: The Difussion of Technology", Research Policy, vol.18, No. 1.

Reinganum, J. (1984), "Practical Implications of game-Theoretic Models of R&D", American Economic Review, Papers y Proceedings, vol. 74, No. 2.

Reinganum, J. (1989), 'The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, and Difussion", en R. Schmalensee y R. Willing (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. 1, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

Robson, M., J. Townsend y K. Pavitt (1988), "Sectoral Pattems of Production and Use of Innovations", Research Policy, vol. 17, febrero.

Rogers, E. (1982), "Information Exchange and Technological Innovation", en D. Sahal (ed.), The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Lexington, Mass, Lexington Books.

Romer, P. (1989), "Capital, Labour and Productivity", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics Issue.

Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press.

Rosenberg, N. (1990), "Why Do firms Do Basic Research (With Their Own Money)?", Research Policy, vol. 19, No. 2.

Salter, W.E.G. (1960), Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1947), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Nueva York, Harper and Row.

Silverberg, G. (1990), "Adoption and Diffusion of Technology as a Collective Evolutionary Process", en Freeman y Soete.

Spence, M. (1984), "Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance", Econometrica, enero.

SPRU (1984), Innovation Survey, Brighton, University of Sussex.

Stiglitz, J. (1987), "Learning to Learn, Localised Leaming and Technological Progress", en Dasgupta y Stoneman.

Tilton, J. (1971), International Difussion of Technology: The Case of Semiconductors, Washington D.C, The Brookings Institution.

Published

1996-12-15

How to Cite

OCDE, O. (1996). Technology diffusion. Redes. Journal of Social Studies of Science and Technology, 3(8), 117–161. https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re8.825

Issue

Section

Dossier