Perspectiva feminista em programas de pós-graduação CTS: diagnóstico sobre suas limitações

Letícia Azevedo Januário; Jussara Ribeiro de Oliveira; Etiene Rocha ROCHA

doi:10.48160/18517072re50.10

Authors

Letícia Azevedo Januário Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Jussara Ribeiro de Oliveira Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Etiene Rocha ROCHA Universidade Federal de São Carlos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48160/18517072re50.10

Keywords:

FEMINIST EPISTEMOLOGY, GENDER CLIPPINGS, STS

Abstract

The feminist perspective of studies in Sciencie, Technology and Society (sts) question the sexist structure of scientific and technological field, the existence of feminine stereotypes and the power relationship in the area, as well as it defend the need for a greater feminine representation and diversity in Science and Technology.With the feminist expansion into others perspectives, it’s necessary to investigate how it has permeated the sts field. In this sense, this study aims to verify if the feminist authors referenced in disciplines of interdisciplinary sts courses still are white women from north hemisphere countries. Therefore, an exploratory and descriptive analysis is carried of bibliographies with a focus on sts studies and feminist studies of the field.The identification of the graduation programs related to sts in Brazil was carried out by a search for in the Sucupira Platform. It was observed that the feminist authors most referenced still are white woman from north hemisphere countries that do not have the same scientific agenda of the “marginalized” countries, as well as it has no identification with the specificities of the black, indigenous women or lgbts from Brazil

References

Anderson, E. (2002), “Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford Centre for the Study of Language and Information, disponíble en: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/

Bauchspies, W., Croissant, J. e S. Restivo (2006), Science, Technology, and Society: A Sociological Approach, Londres, John Wiley & Sons.

Bíblia (2015), “Mateus”, en Bíblia, A Bíblia Sagrada: Velho e Novo Testamento, Salt Lake City, A Igreja de Jesus Cristo dos Santos dos Últimos Dias, pp.1445-1507.

Bottoni, A., Sardano, E. J. e G. B. Costa Filho (2013), “Uma breve história da Universidade no Brasil: de Dom João a Lula e os desafios atuais”, en S. S. Colombo (org.) Gestão Universitária: os caminhos para a excelência, Porto Alegre, Penso.

Etzkowitz, H. e N. Gupta (2006), “Women in Science: A Fair Shake?”, Minerva, 44, (2), pp.185-199.

García, M.I.G. e E.P. Sedeño (2002), “Ciencia, Tecnología y Género”, Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología, Sociedad e Innovación, 2, p. 5.

Harding, S. (2016), “Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41, (6), pp. 1063-1087.

Hess, D.J. et al. (2016), “Structural Inequality and the Politics of Science and Technology”, en Felt, U.; Fouché, R.; Miller, C.A. y L. Smith-Doerr (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 319-347.

Japiassu, H. (2011), “Porque a ciência já nasceu machista?”, en Japiassu, H.

Ciências: questões impertinentes, São Paulo, Ideias e Letras, pp.17-49.

Lugones M. (2014a), Rumo a um feminismo descolonial, Revista Estudos Feministas, 22, (3), pp. 935-952.

Lugones, M. (2014b), “Colonialidad y género”, en Miñoso, Y.E., Correal, D.G. e K.O. Muñoz (eds.), Tejiendo de outro modo: feminismo, epistemologia y apuestas descoloniales em Abya Yala, Popayán, Editorial Universidad del Cauca, pp. 57-73.

Miñoso, Y.E., Correal, D.G. e K.O. Muñoz (eds.) (2014), Tejiendo de outro modo: feminismo, epistemologia y apuestas descoloniales em Abya Yala. Popayán, Editorial Universidad del Cauca.

Miqueo, C. et al. (2011), Ellas también cuentan: cientificas en los comités de revistas biomédicas, Zaragoza, Prensas Universitárias de Zaragoza.

Moser, I. (2006), “Sociotechnical Practices and Difference”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31, (5), pp. 537-564.

Rossiter, M.W. (1993), “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science”, Social Studies Of

Science, 23, (2), pp. 325-341.

Schiebinger, L (1999), “Gender Studies of STS: A Look Toward the Future”, Science, Technology and Society, 4, (1), pp. 95-106.

Sismondo, S. (2010), An introduction to Science and Technology Studies, Londres, Wiley- Blackwell.

Subramaniam, B. et al. (2016), “Feminism, Postcolonialism, Technoscience”, en Felt, U.; Fouché, R.; Miller, C.A. e L. Smith-Doerr (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Cambridge, MIT Press, pp. 407-433.